Heard on the radio news that Iran is angry that the Bush administration is talking about "regime change." Iran points to a treaty signed with the US after the 1979-81 hostage crisis, in which the US promised not to "interfere" in Iran's internal affairs.
The Bush administration responded that it was not "interferring" because its attempts to promote democracy were "nonpartisan" (i.e., not favoring any one party within Iran).
Excuse me? Are the Bush people really that ignorant, or are they merely dishonest? Attempting to force a system of government (even a democracy) onto another country IS interference. By definition.
As Rush used to say, "words have meaning." But almost never for today's "conservatives," it seems.
Ron Paul Liberty Report: British Storm Shadows? Russian ICBMs? How Far Will
Escalation Take Us?
-
On today’s Ron Paul Liberty Report: Early reports (now disputed) that
Russia responded to UK Storm Shadow attacks on Russian territory with the
battle laun...
32 minutes ago
No comments:
Post a Comment