Heard on the radio news that Iran is angry that the Bush administration is talking about "regime change." Iran points to a treaty signed with the US after the 1979-81 hostage crisis, in which the US promised not to "interfere" in Iran's internal affairs.
The Bush administration responded that it was not "interferring" because its attempts to promote democracy were "nonpartisan" (i.e., not favoring any one party within Iran).
Excuse me? Are the Bush people really that ignorant, or are they merely dishonest? Attempting to force a system of government (even a democracy) onto another country IS interference. By definition.
As Rush used to say, "words have meaning." But almost never for today's "conservatives," it seems.
John Mearsheimer on Up the Escalation Ladder
-
Reprinted from John’s Substack: On 18 March 2026, I was on the “Deep Dive”
with Lt. Col. (ret.) Danny Davis naturally talking about the Iran war. We
paid ...
9 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment